Keep research knowledge
independent.
Keep research rules and records separate; validate compatibility when changing models.
Separate domain knowledge from the model interface. Review deployment and permissions before implementation.
Standard APIs · audit logs · human approval
Through agreed interfaces;
no direct database reads or writes.
Research rules · analytical methods · working context
Knowledge stays with the client
when the model changes.
Execution primitives only;
domain logic lives in skills.
Proprietary · open-weight · locally deployed
Replaceable;
validate before switching.
Conceptual architecture. Model changes still require compatibility checks and task validation.
Keep research rules and records separate; validate compatibility when changing models.
Agree read/write permissions and human review before implementation.
Agree deployment, data flows and support access with technology and compliance teams.
Your institutional data and research knowledge remain yours. We design the workflow around your access requirements and agreed operating environment.
Agree deployment, model-service access and data flows before implementation. Processing and support access follow the approved scope.
Define access roles, human review and execution records with your technology and compliance teams.
The knowledge base belongs to your institution and supports full export. Research rules, sources and records remain independent of model interfaces, with handover arrangements agreed in writing.